|
Post by LORD INTERNET DOT COM on May 1, 2009 17:13:43 GMT -5
or you could stop posting
|
|
|
Post by Nate on May 1, 2009 18:14:56 GMT -5
alright you too break it up or get into bed already.
i'm tired of this argument. yes we are here to intervene, but please don't do this stuff on purpose, it just makes my job annoying
|
|
Luke
Toa Nuva
Posts: 2,675
|
Post by Luke on May 1, 2009 21:29:58 GMT -5
We're trying to come to a conclusion here Nate.
You should help instead of just telling us to ignore the topic.
|
|
|
Post by Nate on May 1, 2009 22:21:34 GMT -5
conclusion was reached a page and a half ago by Imatron. i follow what he says.
|
|
Luke
Toa Nuva
Posts: 2,675
|
Post by Luke on May 1, 2009 22:24:53 GMT -5
Conclusion? What was the conclusion?
It just said he was thinking about it but had not decided yet.
|
|
|
Post by LORD INTERNET DOT COM on May 2, 2009 3:44:11 GMT -5
I'm doubting Luke would sign the thing anyway
|
|
Specceh
Toa Nuva
MoD's resident socialist
Posts: 404
|
Post by Specceh on May 2, 2009 4:05:41 GMT -5
Imatron? Conclusions?
|
|
|
Post by Nate on May 2, 2009 8:31:58 GMT -5
Conclusion? What was the conclusion? It just said he was thinking about it but had not decided yet. well it was enough of a conclusion for me for now, can we just stop arguing about stupid things now?
|
|
|
Post by Imatron on May 3, 2009 22:41:09 GMT -5
Deleted a post before it could get on a staffers nerv, My apologies for the invonveinience.
The main argument seems to be one person will see it and think its okay to do without knowing their in on the thing.
My concerns and what Id like input on:
*Would it be practical to have a sort of code word like "Joking @ Aegis" to enable an amount of "offensiveness" to be tolerated, and would filtering the word "joking @" to link to a description of the rules for this words use?
*Im concerned that allowing any offeniveness, like filtering curse words indescriminatley to help prevent unfair moderating, if it could become difficult to properly enforce and wind up being a problem reulting in more boardwide flaming. Whats your opinion on this thought, and what circumstances do you think I need to connsider along with it?
|
|
Luke
Toa Nuva
Posts: 2,675
|
Post by Luke on May 3, 2009 22:44:23 GMT -5
So you're basically just saying my "Nah" was called for since you are asking us to not ignore the subject? Then don't delete it.
Ignoring problems is a good way to solve them supposedly?
|
|
|
Post by Imatron on May 3, 2009 22:44:47 GMT -5
Conclusion? What was the conclusion? It just said he was thinking about it but had not decided yet. well it was enough of a conclusion for me for now, can we just stop arguing about stupid things now? adressing this: Yes, lets not ARGUE about it, lets DISCUSS it , respecting eachother's input without judging them based on their input.
|
|
|
Post by Imatron on May 3, 2009 22:48:50 GMT -5
So you're basically just saying my "Nah" was called for since you are asking us to not ignore the subject? Then don't delete it. Ignoring problems is a good way to solve them supposedly? Im agreeing we dont need to argue but to discuss it. I thought scholzie might take it the wrong way. I wanted to preemptivley remove it to prevent that possible misunderstanding (besides getting you two mad at eachother) from leading to an argument rather than discussion of the requested subjects.
|
|
Luke
Toa Nuva
Posts: 2,675
|
Post by Luke on May 3, 2009 23:02:59 GMT -5
It's kind of hard to discuss things here without arguing if you haven't noticed.
Even when I try to do my part in not arguing somebody else has to get it going.
|
|
|
Post by MercenaryXero on May 3, 2009 23:08:53 GMT -5
Idea: all arguing must be done with cute emoticons
Its worked before
|
|
Luke
Toa Nuva
Posts: 2,675
|
Post by Luke on May 3, 2009 23:09:46 GMT -5
I like this idea
|
|
john
Toa Nuva
doesn't afraid of anything
Posts: 891
|
Post by john on May 4, 2009 0:56:41 GMT -5
Idea: all arguing must be done with cute emoticons Its worked before I support this
|
|
|
Post by LORD INTERNET DOT COM on May 4, 2009 1:00:45 GMT -5
i realise it's not cute
|
|
Specceh
Toa Nuva
MoD's resident socialist
Posts: 404
|
Post by Specceh on May 4, 2009 6:13:08 GMT -5
Idea: all arguing must be done with cute emoticons Its worked before I support this I do not. It is obnoxious and annoying.*Would it be practical to have a sort of code word like "Joking @ Aegis" to enable an amount of "offensiveness" to be tolerated, and would filtering the word "joking @" to link to a description of the rules for this words use? No. Not only is this completely impractical, but explaining the joke ceases to make it funny. Furthermore, it's just ridiculous. If people can't pick up sarcasm, well, I'm not quite sure what to say.*Im concerned that allowing any offeniveness, like filtering curse words indescriminatley to help prevent unfair moderating, if it could become difficult to properly enforce and wind up being a problem reulting in more boardwide flaming. Whats your opinion on this thought, and what circumstances do you think I need to connsider along with it? Please elaborate.
|
|
|
Post by MercenaryXero on May 4, 2009 22:03:14 GMT -5
|
|
Monasti
Toa Nuva
Squid Hunter
Posts: 3,305
|
Post by Monasti on May 5, 2009 9:52:23 GMT -5
Deleted some Spam.
Seriously guys, at least TRY to keep on topic.
|
|
|
Post by Nate on May 5, 2009 14:05:52 GMT -5
It's kind of hard to discuss things here without arguing if you haven't noticed. Even when I try to do my part in not arguing somebody else has to get it going. in my opinion we were arguing about the fact that imatron hadn't met a conclusion, Which is a stupid thing to argue about. so i decided to walk away from the subject.
|
|
Luke
Toa Nuva
Posts: 2,675
|
Post by Luke on May 5, 2009 14:43:44 GMT -5
Let's not nitpick here.
Arguing about arguing is even more pointless than arguing about stupid things.
|
|
|
Post by LORD INTERNET DOT COM on May 5, 2009 14:58:26 GMT -5
no it isn't
|
|
Luke
Toa Nuva
Posts: 2,675
|
Post by Luke on May 5, 2009 15:03:03 GMT -5
Well that's your opinion.
|
|
|
Post by LORD INTERNET DOT COM on May 5, 2009 16:14:03 GMT -5
what and yours isn't
ololololo
|
|
Luke
Toa Nuva
Posts: 2,675
|
Post by Luke on May 5, 2009 18:08:17 GMT -5
Nope.
|
|
|
Post by Nate on May 5, 2009 18:50:32 GMT -5
Let's not nitpick here. Arguing about arguing is even more pointless than arguing about stupid things. i didn't intend that as an argument, merely as clarification.
|
|
Luke
Toa Nuva
Posts: 2,675
|
Post by Luke on May 5, 2009 21:59:43 GMT -5
K then.
|
|