|
|
Post by LORD INTERNET DOT COM on Apr 29, 2009 17:26:44 GMT -5
sometimes the staff say that pms count as off site; re: when some guy threw (hilarious) death threats at me
but other times they don't; re: when whimsy sent those horrible pictures to those kids
clarification plz
|
|
|
|
Post by Nate on Apr 29, 2009 20:25:57 GMT -5
idk..... because imatron knows its you he doesn't do anything about it.
Because its little ten year olds or people who are scarred easily who ususally recieve whimsy's pms, its a little different story............
I have nothing to clarify. it depends on the mod and the mod's mood.
|
|
|
|
Post by Imatron on Apr 29, 2009 21:39:24 GMT -5
Im... not entirley sure on that one. On one hand I prefer if Private Messages remained private, but when we recieve messages from multiple members that they have been PMed nasty images by a particular member, the same member who also at least once pmed similar images to the staffers...I feel I have to do something in that case.
I understand theres a way for staff to view PMs, which I think only I could do under the current settings, plus the whole "work things out by PM" rule being started up... I need more input on what everyone thinks should be allowed via PM and how the staff should act on it, before I can make a decent decision on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by SagasRedemption on Apr 29, 2009 22:06:37 GMT -5
Explicit Images, violent or "Adult" should be on the "take action aginesnt" list
as well as arguments that get to the point of just being harrasment.
|
|
|
|
Post by LORD INTERNET DOT COM on Apr 30, 2009 4:12:33 GMT -5
out of hand is a really rather vague term though; where is "the line" drawn, and how do you draw it if external intervention has been disallowed up to that point
|
|
Luke
Toa Nuva
Posts: 2,675
|
Post by Luke on Apr 30, 2009 11:54:25 GMT -5
Arguing should be allowed over PMs but violent and adult content shouldn't.
Nasty images will break my bones but words will never hurt me.
|
|
|
|
Post by LORD INTERNET DOT COM on Apr 30, 2009 12:56:00 GMT -5
these rules seem rather vague, and when substance is considered they have bias against whimsy
|
|
Luke
Toa Nuva
Posts: 2,675
|
Post by Luke on Apr 30, 2009 13:32:54 GMT -5
I don't blame them.
Whimsy sent me one of those messages too.
|
|
|
|
Post by LORD INTERNET DOT COM on Apr 30, 2009 14:19:19 GMT -5
you deserved it
|
|
Luke
Toa Nuva
Posts: 2,675
|
Post by Luke on Apr 30, 2009 14:42:27 GMT -5
I didn't care, but I see why they reported him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Timekeeper on Apr 30, 2009 16:17:46 GMT -5
I think Whimsy needs to just stop getting caught.
|
|
|
|
Post by MercenaryXero on Apr 30, 2009 20:43:11 GMT -5
Maybe he has an internet punishment fetish
|
|
|
|
Post by LORD INTERNET DOT COM on May 1, 2009 1:57:31 GMT -5
whimsy has all the fetishes
|
|
Specceh
Toa Nuva
MoD's resident socialist
Posts: 404
|
Post by Specceh on May 1, 2009 2:37:02 GMT -5
It's just because Whimsy is stupid and does stupid things for stupid reasons.
|
|
